Friday, February 26, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Ethics

National College Admissions Scandal Reveals Corrupt Underbelly of College Exams and Athletic Recruitment

Charges Including Racketeering and Money Laundering Brought Against Dozens

by Michael Volkov
March 22, 2019
in Ethics, Featured
bribe beside college admissions envelope

News broke last week of a scandal in which high-profile executives and celebrities allegedly used bribery to secure their children’s admission to colleges across the U.S. Michael Volkov gives background on the story and its principal players.

In a shocking announcement, federal prosecutors announced the arrest and charges against numerous individuals in connection with a nationwide criminal investigation focusing on college entrance exam cheating and admission of students to elite universities as fake athletic recruits. Athletic coaches from Yale, Stanford, USC, Wake Forest and Georgetown, as well as parents and exam administrators have been implicated.

At the center of the scam was William “Rick” Singer of Newport Beach, California, who was charged with and pleaded guilty to racketeering, conspiracy, money laundering and obstruction of justice. Singer owned and operated the Edge College & Career Network, a for-profit college counseling and preparation business. Singer was also the CEO of the Key Worldwide Foundation (KWF), a nonprofit corporation that he established as a purported charity.

Over an eight-year period, 2011 to 2019, Singer conspired with dozens of parents, athletic coaches, a university athletics administrator and others to use bribes and fraud to secure students’ admission to college and universities. Thirty-three parents and 13 coaches and associates of Singer were charged with criminal offenses. Among the persons charged were John Vandemoer, the head sailing coach at Stanford University; Rudy Meredith, the former head soccer coach at Yale University; and Mark Riddell, a counselor at a private School in Bradenton, Florida.

Singer and his associates bribed SAT and ACT exam administrators to allow a test taker (usually Riddell) to secretly take college entrance exams in place of students or correct students’ exams. (In most cases, the students were not aware that their parents arranged for cheating scams). Singer instructed clients to seek extended time for their children on college exams based on false claims of learning disabilities. Once the extended time was authorized, Singer directed clients to seek relocation of test to another test center where he had bribed administrators, including at locations in Houston, Texas and West Hollywood, California. Singer paid the administrators approximately $10,000 per test. The administrators allowed a third person to take the test in place of the students, give the students the answers or correct the answers after they completed the exams. Singer’s clients paid between $15,000 and $75,000 per test and structured the payments as charitable donations to Singer’s fake charity.

Singer also orchestrated payment of approximately $25 million to bribe college coaches and administrators to designate their children as athletic recruits. Singer described the scheme to parents as a “side door,” in which they paid Singer through charitable donations. Singer funneled payments to programs controlled by the athletic coaches, who then designated the children as recruited athletes. Singer paid bribes to the coaches personally and his employees created fake athletic profiles for students with false information concerning honors and elite teams they purportedly played on.

Singer used his charitable organization to disguise bribe payments from clients, who then deducted the bribes from their federal income taxes. The employees mailed letters from the charity thanking them for their contributions and falsely stated that no goods or services were exchanged for the donations. Many clients filed personal tax returns that falsely reported the payment to the charity as a donation.

The roster of charged defendants is eye-opening and includes: Gordon Caplan, co-chairman of Willkie Farr; Felicity Huffman, an actress; Lori Loughlin, an actress; and a host of successful businesspersons and college coaches: the former head soccer coach of the woman’s team at Yale University; the former sailing coach at Stanford University; the complicit test administrators in Houston, Texas and West Hollywood, California; the former head coach of men and women’s tennis at Georgetown University; the former women’s volleyball coach at Wake Forest University; the senior associate athletic director, former women’s soccer head coach and assistant coach at the University of Southern California; the former head coach of men’s soccer at UCLA; the former water polo coach at the University of Southern California; and the head coach of men’s tennis at the University of Texas.

The defendants engaged in a brazen conspiracy, much of which is captured on a Title III wiretap-recorded conversations and meetings. The discussion of corrupt conduct is open and notorious, with little mention of ethics or acting to further a criminal scheme. The ease with which parents and college administrators acted in a corrupt and criminal manner is mind-boggling, to say the least.

This article was republished with permission from Michael Volkov’s blog, Corruption, Crime & Compliance.


Tags: anti-corruptionbribery
Previous Post

Using Emerging Tech to Fight Financial Crime: The Future is Now

Next Post

Brexit, Uncertainty and Values at Risk: 5 Risk Management Lessons

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlaw.com. Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

woman looking at horizon from mountain top

What’s on the Horizon for Anti-Corruption Enforcement?

February 25, 2021
cannabis leaf on $100 bill

The Intersection of EDD and Banking Cannabis

February 24, 2021
gold cup award on red background with stars

Ethisphere Announces the 2021 World’s Most Ethical Companies

February 23, 2021
illustration of hand holding flashlight illuminating hidden stairs

The Corporate Transparency Act: Pulling Back the Veil

February 23, 2021
Next Post
brexit chess strategy concept

Brexit, Uncertainty and Values at Risk: 5 Risk Management Lessons

Access realtime data
Addressing systemic racism in the workplace SAI Global
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights