Sunday, March 7, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Featured

Stop the Presses! The Fifth Circuit Vacates the DOL Fiduciary Rule

by George Kostolampros
April 18, 2018
in Featured, Financial Services
newspaper press in action

The Fifth Circuit Vacates the DOL Fiduciary Rule

On March 15, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in a 2-1 decision,1 vacated the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Fiduciary Rule. The Fifth Circuit found that the DOL overstepped its authority and acted unreasonably by enacting the Fiduciary Rule.

with co-authors Michael R. Manley, Lisa A. Tavares, Carol V. Calhoun and Danna E. Brown

The Fiduciary Rule

The Fiduciary Rule, enacted by the DOL, reinterpreted the “investment advice fiduciary” definition and the exemptions to provisions for a fiduciary in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).2 The new rule was controversial because, among other reasons, it required broker-dealers and other financial professionals to adopt the “best interest” standard, which replaced the DOL’s five-part test (and over 40 years of precedent) to determine whether one acted as a fiduciary. In addition, the Fiduciary Rule established the “Best Interest Contract Exemption,” which provides a series of requirements to qualify for the exemption and avoid prohibited transaction penalties.

The DOL took the position that reinterpretation was necessary to fill perceived gaps for those who provide investment advice to ERISA plans and individual retirement accounts (IRAs), but did not fit within the prior five-part test. Under the Fiduciary Rule, service providers, such as broker-dealers, who do business with ERISA plans and IRA holders would be exposed to the fiduciary obligations and duties under ERISA. As the Fifth Circuit recognized, the Fiduciary Rule “is of monumental significance to the financial services and insurance sectors of the economy.” The regulation runs 275 pages, and DOL estimated that it could cost regulated parties $31.5 billion over 10 years to comply with the rule.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups challenged the DOL’s Fiduciary Rule. Among other things, they argued that the DOL’s construction of the rule was unreasonable and arbitrary that the DOL had embarked on an “ambitious new regulatory scheme…to circumvent its lack of authority over…IRAs.”

The Fifth Circuit’s Decision

The Fifth Circuit Court found that the DOL’s reinterpretation of “investment advice fiduciary” did not align with the long-standing common law definition of fiduciary and that the new definition no longer took into account the regular basis and primary basis criteria that were historically used in ERISA. Consequently, the Fiduciary Rule encompasses virtually all financial and insurance professionals who do business with ERISA plans and IRA holders.3 The Fifth Circuit Court held that the DOL’s expanded definition was not a reasonable interpretation of the term “fiduciary” in ERISA and that the Fiduciary Rule did not align with the legislative intent of Congress. Furthermore, the Court noted that when Congress enacted ERISA, “it was well aware of the distinction between investment advisers, who were considered fiduciaries, and stockbrokers and insurance agents, who generally assumed no such status in selling products to their clients.”4

In addition, the Fifth Circuit Court stated that the DOL exceeded its authority in promulgating the Fiduciary Rule based on a false assumption that Congress had given the DOL the power to do so under ERISA and the IRC, and, accordingly, the Court struck down the DOL’s Fiduciary Rule and relevant exemptions.

What Next?

The DOL can appeal the Fifth Circuit Court’s ruling by seeking either en banc review by the full Fifth Circuit or review by the Supreme Court. It remains unclear whether the DOL will appeal. In that regard, in February 2018, President Trump directed the DOL to reconsider the Fiduciary Rule because it may not be “consistent with the policies of my Administration.” If the DOL does not appeal, although other federal courts have upheld the Fiduciary Rule, some commentators have argued that the decision could apply nationwide, thus effectively vacating the rule in all jurisdictions.

The SEC chairman recently stated that the SEC is still moving forward with its fiduciary rule, and its work will not be affected by the Fifth Circuit’s decision. Yet it remains unclear what the SEC’s rule will ultimately look like.

For firms that have implemented policies designed to comply with the DOL’s Fiduciary Rule, the best course will be to maintain those policies until there is more clarity from DOL as to how it intends to proceed in regard to appealing the Fifth Circuit’s decision or further action is taken by the Administration or Congress. As for changes to those policies, firms should consider the effects of this decision if they were intending to rely on the Best Interest Contract Exemption where they received conflicted compensation.

____________________________________
[1] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. United States Department of Labor, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 6472 (5th Cir. 2018)

[2] “The Fiduciary Rule provides that an individual ‘renders investment advice for a fee’ whenever he is compensated in connection with a ‘recommendation as to the advisability of’ buying selling or managing ‘investment property.'” Id. at 8.

[3] Id. at 8.

[4] Id. at 19.


Tags: department of laborSEC
Previous Post

The Henman Innovative Approach to Hiring

Next Post

TRACE: Cost-Effective Internal Investigations

George Kostolampros

George Kostolampros is a Partner at Venable LLP.  He advises and represents clients in investigations and litigation by federal, industry and state regulatory and enforcement authorities before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), Financial Industry Regulation Authority (FINRA) and other government agencies and self-regulatory agencies. He has extensive experience advising audit committees, special committees, broker-dealers, hedge funds, asset managers, financial professionals, lawyers and other institutions and individuals in connection with civil and criminal law enforcement. George also has significant experience conducting internal investigations for clients relating to the securities laws and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). In addition, George has significant experience litigating matters involving securities laws and other business disputes, including class action litigation. George has represented clients in administrative proceedings before the SEC and litigation involving shareholder disputes, False Claims Act claims, breach of contract and other business disputes. George also counsels clients with respect to corporate governance, internal controls and compliance programs. His compliance-related work has included various aspects of the securities laws and drafting policies and procedures, including codes of conduct, insider trading, anti-corruption and FCPA and other policies. Prior to joining Venable, Mr. Kostolampros was a senior counsel in the Division of Enforcement of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, both in New York and in Washington, D.C. While at the SEC, he investigated possible violations of the federal securities laws, including accounting fraud, improper mutual fund trading, market manipulation, FCPA violations and other conduct. During his tenure at the SEC, he worked closely with other federal and state agencies, including the Department of Justice, United States Attorney’s offices and the Office of the New York Attorney General.

Related Posts

green and red location markers on map

FinCEN’s Registry Will Be a Game-Changer. It Will Also Place an Added Burden on Corporations.

March 5, 2021
illustration of man under giant gavel

BitPay’s $507K OFAC Sanctions Violations Settlement

March 4, 2021
The facade of the SEC in Washington, D.C.

Prepare Now to Comply with SEC’s Updated MD&A and Related Financial Disclosure Requirements

March 3, 2021
Illustration representing a facial recognition technology scan of a face.

Facial Recognition Technology in the Workplace: Employers Use It, Workers Hate It, Regulation Is Coming for It

March 3, 2021
Next Post
TRACE: Cost-Effective Internal Investigations

TRACE: Cost-Effective Internal Investigations

OneTrust offers download to demonstrate privacy management leadership
Access realtime data
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence ESG fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights