Thursday, February 25, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Risk

Nepal: Risk from the Theoretical to Reality

by James Bone
June 3, 2015
in Risk
think4photop / Shutterstock.com

The Nepal earthquake, which triggered massive destruction from the Himalayan Mountains to India, is more than a tragic story of bad luck. It’s an example of how little we really understand risk and the consequences of our inability to fully absorb events such as earthquakes in Nepal and Haiti and other natural disasters that are so devastating.

Even our perception of these events is skewed.  According to the USGS website, the U.S. government’s official site for monitoring earthquakes, approximately one major earthquake of magnitude 8.0 or greater has occurred each year over the last 24 years.  We tend to discount major disaster in our own lives while believing there is a higher probability that others may suffer calamity.  That may explain why so many say we “never saw that coming” when disaster strikes.  Many of these quakes have occurred with little damage or no deaths, but we remember the ones with a high death toll and quickly dismiss the others.

Given our inability to look into the future, the question is: has our world become more or less risky?  Well, it depends!  For many of us, the perception of risk depends on our own circumstances.  Let’s take two people of similar age but from remarkably different backgrounds.

The first person is a young woman in the U.S. preparing to go to college and prepare for her chosen career.  The second person, a young woman who happens to live in Nepal, which was ravished by the recent earthquake.  The differences in how each person sees risk becomes quite obvious when the circumstances faced by the other are taken into account.

For each person reading this article, his or her own perception of risk will differ from another’s, which simply means that risk is relative to our ability to absorb the risk.  Starting with $1 billion, I am more willing to risk $1 million if I believe my return will be greater.  By the same token, if I have only $10,000, I may be more reluctant to risk $1,000 on a relative basis.

Tragically, a recent CNN report noted that only 14 percent of the projected aid needed in Nepal has been committed to, and even less has reached those most affected.  The most remote villages in the region are at risk of large-scale human disaster unless more can be done.  As in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, there will be a continuing effort to bring normalcy back to Nepal.  The resources may never match the need, given the lack of infrastructure both in physical and financial terms.

Can we learn lessons from these events?  Or are these simply examples of bad luck?  The answer is — surprisingly — yes to both questions.

Thankfully, most of the risks that we deal with on a daily basis are not on the scale of an earthquake.  Yet do we understand the probabilities of the “earthquakes” in our industry or business?  What do I mean by that?   If you live in Asia, the likelihood of a large earthquake is greater than if you live in New England.  Understanding the difference can be a subtle but powerful tool for dealing with uncertainty.

Bad luck happens!  But is it possible to anticipate and plan for uncertainty?  Intuitively, we make these decisions everyday.  We predict the odds of outcomes in a variety of ways; some are crude measures of experience and others include some level of sophistication.  But is rolling the dice enough?  Of course not!

Developing a basic understanding of probability helps to put risk in perspective.  Even simple models are useful and can provide information that we may not otherwise consider.  Any model of probability will have a degree of error, depending on the quality of the data used in the model and the sophistication of the model builder.  The key point is that we do not have the ability to fully understand risk without some assistance.

Understanding the variance in error rate is more important than the perceived accuracy of the model. 

Practitioners of probabilistic modeling are good cynics of their own ability to predict with accuracy.  Even more important than understanding your error rate may be the ability to make plans for an eventuality you hope never happens.

The take away is that organizational awareness of risk is a process of refinement over time where no one gets it right 100 percent of the time.  Perceived in this light, risk management is the process of learning your error rate and finding ways to narrow the gap.

Firms who go beyond risk measurement and assessment to a model of monitoring the gap in error rates may learn more about their risk management program than by only looking at what risk they avoided.


Previous Post

The FIFA Indictments and Travel Act Prosecutions under the FCPA

Next Post

Speak Up! − Promoting a Compliance Culture

James Bone

James Bone’s career has spanned 29 years of management, financial services and regulatory compliance risk experience with Frito-Lay, Inc., Abbot Labs, Merrill Lynch, and Fidelity Investments. James founded Global Compliance Associates, LLC and TheGRCBlueBook in 2009 to consult with global professional services firms, private equity investors, and risk and compliance professionals seeking insights in governance, risk and compliance (“GRC”) leading practices and best in class vendors.
James is a frequent speaker at industry conferences and contributing writer for Compliance Week and Corporate Compliance Insights and serves as faculty presenter and independent consultant for several global consulting firms specializing in governance, risk and compliance, IT compliance and the GRC vendor market. James created TheGRCBlueBook.com to provide risk and compliance professionals with transparency into the GRC vendor marketplace by creating a forum for writing reviews on GRC products and sharing success stories on the risk practices that are most effective. James is currently attending Harvard Extension School for a Master of Arts in Management with an emphasis in accounting and finance. James received an honorary PhD in Letters from Drury University in Springfield, Missouri and is a member of the Breech Business School Hall of Fame as well as the Missouri Sports Hall of Fame. Having graduated from the Boston University Graduate School of Education, James received his M.Ed. in Management and Organizational Design in 1997 and a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration from Drury University in 1980.  

Related Posts

blue road sign with arrow on black asphalt background

Dynamic Risk Governance: Linking Strategy and Risk Management

February 15, 2021
three red dice on green felt tabletop

The COVID Trio: 3 Top Risks from a Year of Upset

February 4, 2021
Deloitte: Global Risk Management Survey, 12th Edition

Deloitte: Global Risk Management Survey, 12th Edition

February 2, 2021
illustration of businessman holding giant shield to protect him from falling arrows

Is Your Risk Culture Aligned With the Realities of the Digital Age?

February 2, 2021
Next Post
Speak Up! − Promoting a Compliance Culture

Speak Up! − Promoting a Compliance Culture

Access realtime data
Addressing systemic racism in the workplace SAI Global
Dynamic Risk Assessments with Workiva
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk supply chain technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights