Friday, March 5, 2021
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Articles
    • See All Articles
    • NEW: COVID-Related
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Leadership and Career
  • Vendor News
  • Jobs
    • Compliance & Risk
    • Information Security
  • Events
    • Webinars & Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Downloads
    • eBooks
    • Whitepapers
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Food Safety Criminal Prosecutions

by Michael Volkov
March 15, 2016
in Compliance
Where food safety is concerned, the consequences of noncompliance can be deadly

This article was republished with permission from Michael Volkov’s blog, Corruption, Crime & Compliance.

Over the last 10 to 20 years, we have witnessed the expansion of federal criminal prosecution of health and safety matters. Environmental and food and drug regulatory enforcement has been supplemented by aggressive criminal enforcement.

In the last few years, we have seen some landmark criminal cases involving companies and executives for food safety violations. Compliance programs in these high-risk industries can literally be a matter of life and death. Judges are handing out tough criminal sentences when warranted.

Each week we hear about the outbreak of a new foodborne illness. Weeks after that, we then usually hear about a criminal investigation against the company and sometimes individual executives.

Criminal prosecutors are reinvigorating criminal enforcement of the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act and hanging their hats on the prohibition against introducing adulterated food to interstate commerce. An intentional or knowing violation of this prohibition is a felony criminal offense.

The most notorious criminal case in years was the criminal case against Peanut Corporation of America for distributing peanut butter that contained salmonella. Approximately 30,000 individuals became ill and nine people died from the contaminated peanut butter.  Five people were convicted, including the CEO and his brother, who were sentenced to 28 and 20 years in prison, respectively. The government proved at trial that the CEO and his brother knew the peanut butter was contaminated and nonetheless ordered the peanut butter to be distributed.

Criminal investigations have been launched against Chipotle and Blue Bell for the sale of tainted food. It is reasonable to expect that DOJ prosecutors will seek to identify individuals responsible for the outbreaks and pursue criminal charges.

The DOJ has been racking up a number of individuals for criminal prosecution on food safety issues. For example, in 2012, two brothers were prosecuted for distributing listeria-infected cantaloupe in Colorado. They pleaded guilty and each received a sentence of five years probation.

In 2013, a father and son were charged distributing eggs with salmonella, resulting in the recall of half a billion eggs and the sickening of at least 60,000 people. Both father and son were sentenced to three months in jail and ordered to pay fines.

ConAgra pleaded guilty to selling peanut butter tainted with salmonella and paid a fine of $11 million.

As new food safety contaminations are reported in the press, criminal prosecutions are a real and significant threat. Public health officials and food scientists are much more familiar with outbreak issues and are pushing for criminal prosecutions of executives who are arguably responsible for these serious outbreaks.

The issuance of the Yates memorandum, coupled with the DOJ’s willingness to use the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, authorizes the DOJ to prosecute individuals who lacked knowing or even had reckless intent to violate the law, raises the stakes even higher.

Food manufacturing and distribution companies have to redouble their compliance efforts. Food safety demands that companies review and assess relevant risks, increase auditing and monitoring and ensure that they meet best practices. Companies that ignore these risks are facing serious prosecution possibilities.

One of the most significant risks for food manufacturers is management of their supply chains. It is not a legitimate defense to argue that a supplier provided a manufacturer with tainted food products, since the manufacturer has diligence and quality assessment obligations to ensure the safety of ingredients and supplies needed to manufacture food.

Finally, every food company needs to have a response and remediation plan. Companies that ignore a claim of adulteration or illness are certain to face greater criminal risks.  On the other hand, when a company responds to reports of illness and investigates the claims quickly, the company can then respond and remediate a dangerous situation.


Previous Post

Mining Open Payments Spend Data

Next Post

Kroll and Ethisphere Launch 2016 Anti-Bribery & Corruption Report

Michael Volkov

Michael-Volkov-leclairryan Michael Volkov is the CEO of The Volkov Law Group LLC, where he provides compliance, internal investigation and white collar defense services.  He can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlaw.com. Michael has extensive experience representing clients on matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, money laundering, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), export controls, sanctions and International Traffic in Arms, False Claims Act, Congressional investigations, online gambling and regulatory enforcement issues. Michael served for more than 17 years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia; for five years as the Chief Crime and Terrorism Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Chief Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Counsel for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees; and as a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Michael also maintains a well-known blog: Corruption Crime & Compliance, which is frequently cited by anti-corruption professionals and professionals in the compliance industry.

Related Posts

illustration of man under giant gavel

BitPay’s $507K OFAC Sanctions Violations Settlement

March 4, 2021
Thinking Outside the Tick Box

Thinking Outside the Tick Box: Compliance Training as a Competitive Advantage

March 3, 2021
The facade of the SEC in Washington, D.C.

Prepare Now to Comply with SEC’s Updated MD&A and Related Financial Disclosure Requirements

March 3, 2021
illustration of hand holding flashlight illuminating hidden stairs

The Corporate Transparency Act: Pulling Back the Veil

February 23, 2021
Next Post
Kroll and Ethisphere Launch 2016 Anti-Bribery & Corruption Report

Kroll and Ethisphere Launch 2016 Anti-Bribery & Corruption Report

OneTrust offers download to demonstrate privacy management leadership
Access realtime data
Top 10 Risk and Compliance Trends

Special Coverage

Special COVID page graphic

Jump to a Topic:

anti-corruption anti-money laundering/AML Artificial Intelligence/A.I. automation banks board of directors board risk oversight bribery CCPA/California Consumer Privacy Act Cloud Compliance communications management Coronavirus/COVID-19 corporate culture crisis management cyber crime cyber risk data analytics data breach data governance decision-making diversity DOJ due diligence ESG fcpa enforcement actions financial crime GDPR GRC HIPAA information security KYC/know your customer machine learning monitoring ransomware regtech reputation risk risk assessment Sanctions SEC social media risk technology third party risk management tone at the top training whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed

Category

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Whitepapers

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Vendor News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • eBooks
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe

© 2019 Corporate Compliance Insights