No Result
View All Result
SUBSCRIBE | NO FEES, NO PAYWALLS
MANAGE MY SUBSCRIPTION
NEWSLETTER
Corporate Compliance Insights
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Compliance Insights
Home Compliance

Court Overrules States’ Exceptions to Clean Air Act

by Peter McGrath
October 21, 2016
in Compliance
Companies’ compliance with Clean Air Act could be at risk

Under the Clean Air Act, the United States Environmental Protection Agency can delegate to a state the authority to implement the Clean Air Act in that state if the state develops a “State Implementation Plan” (SIP).  The EPA will delegate implantation authority if the EPA determines the SIP properly allows implementation and enforcement of the act within that state.  If a state has been delegated authority to implement the Clean Act in its state, the state itself issues Clean Air Act permits for sources in its jurisdiction and enforces those permits and the other provisions of the Clean Air Act.

Most states are very eager to receive and maintain delegation of authority to implement the Act within the state, because they believe that state government can more appropriately and effectively regulate sources in those states than the federal EPA would.  The Clean Air Act provides a mechanism commonly called an “SIP call” for correcting an SIP that the EPA finds no longer substantially adequate to meet Clean Air Act requirements.  Once the EPA has approved an SIP, it can issue an SIP call to a state, requiring the state in question to modify its SIP or risk the EPA revoking its delegation of authority to that state.   Under pressure from the Sierra Club, the EPA in 2015 issued an SIP call with respect to the SIPs of more than 30 states concerning provisions of SIPs relating to emissions during start‑up, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) periods.

States issue permits under the Clean Air Act that limit emissions of air pollutants from permitted sources.  Exceptions from permit emissions limits during SSM periods exist in a number of state rules, some of which were adopted and approved into SIPs by the EPA many years ago.  Recent court decisions, however, have held that under the Clean Air Act, such exceptions are not allowed in SIPs plans.  When those SSM exceptions were included, it was widely believed that admissions limitations set at levels representing good control of admissions during periods of so called “normal” operations could in some cases not be met with the same emission control strategies during SSM periods, or during maintenance.

Prior to 1982, “normal” operations was meant by the EPA to refer to periods of operation other than start‑up, shutdown, maintenance or malfunction.  Since 1982, however, the EPA has used the term “normal” in the ordinary sense of the word, to distinguish between predictable modes of source operation such as start‑up and shutdown and genuine “malfunctions,” which are by definition supposed to be unpredictable and unforeseen events and which could not have been precluded by proper source design, maintenance and operation.[1]

It became common for state plans to include provisions for special, more lenient treatment of excess admissions during such periods of start‑up, shutdown, maintenance or malfunction.  Many of those provisions took the form of absolute statements that excess admissions during SSM were not to be considered violation of state rules.  The EPA ultimately agreed with the Sierra Club that many of the state SSM provisions are not permissible under the Clean Air Act.  The EPA identified 41 states with potentially problematic SSM provisions and in June of 2015 ultimately issued an SIP call for 36 of those states.  A list of those states is included at the end of this article.[2]

The EPA established a November 22 deadline by which each affected state is to respond to the SIP call.  The EPA has indicated that the states receiving the SIP call will in general have options as exactly how to revise their SIPs.  Provisions that are effective by the SIP call (the automatic exemption provisions discussed above) have to be removed entirely and an affected source could no longer depend on the exemption to avoid all liability for excess emissions during SSM events.

The types of provisions (a provision granting a state air agency discretion to enforce exceedances during SSM events) could either be removed entirely from an SIP or retained, if revised appropriately, to apply only to state enforcement personnel.  The EPA has stated that if a state removes an SIP provision that pertains to the state’s exercise of enforcement discretion, this removal would not affect the ability of the state to apply its traditional enforcement discretion and its enforcement program.

The implications for regulated sources in the affected states will depend on the nature and frequency of the sources SSM events and how the state has chosen to revise its SIP to address any excess emissions during SSM occurrences.  In addition, if a state fails to make the required SIP revision, the EPA could impose a 2‑to‑1 emission offset requirement for all new and modified major sources subject to non‑attainment new source review and restrictions on highway funding.

If you own or operate an air emissions source in any of the states listed in the chart below, you should check your permit to determine whether the permit includes any SSM exceptions or exemptions.  If the permit does include specific SSM provisions, you should contact your permitting authority to determine how your state has responded to the SIP call.

mcgrath-table-improved-2

[1] 1982 start-up, shutdown, malfunction guidance attachment page 2.  The 1982 guidance is in the EPA Rule Making Docket at EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0322-0005.

[2] The source of the list an accompanying information is the EPA’s “State Plans to Address Emissions During Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction: Final Action on Response to Petition for Rulemaking, Restatement of Policy, Findings of Inadequacy and Call for Revisions Fact Sheet,” https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/docs/20150522fs.pdf.


Previous Post

New Strategies for Governance

Next Post

Vendor Risk Management Solution Checklist

Peter McGrath

Peter McGrath

September 17 - Peter McGrath headshotA frequent lecturer and author on diverse environmental issues, Peter McGrath, a member at Moore & Van Allen, brings to his wide-ranging clients extensive counseling and litigation experience with environmental issues arising in business and real estate transactions.

Related Posts

PW FCPA Enforcement and Anticorruption 2022 Review_f

FCPA Enforcement & Anti-Corruption Developments

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 30, 2023

The year that was in FCPA & anti-corruption efforts 2022: A Year in Review FCPA Enforcement & Anti-Corruption Developments What’s...

JTC ESG and Impact Investing_f

The Evolution of ESG & Impact Investing: Are You Ready?

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 30, 2023

Making money *and* doing the right thing Survey Report The Evolution of ESG & Impact Investing: Are You Ready? What’s...

Regology 2023 State of Regulatory Compliance_f

2023 State of Regulatory Compliance

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 30, 2023

Understanding the impact of regulatory challenges Survey Report 2023 State of Regulatory Compliance What’s in this report from Regology:As the...

product update riskoptics

Reciprocity Rebrands to RiskOptics, Updates ROAR Platform

by Corporate Compliance Insights
March 30, 2023

Reciprocity, an information security risk and compliance provider, is now RiskOptics, after the company formally announced a rebranding initiative and...

Next Post
VRMS checklist from Rsam

Vendor Risk Management Solution Checklist

Compliance Job Interview Q&A

Jump to a Topic

AML Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Artificial Intelligence (AI) Automation Banking Board of Directors Board Risk Oversight Business Continuity Planning California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Code of Conduct Communications Management Corporate Culture COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Culture of Ethics Cybercrime Cyber Risk Data Analytics Data Breach Data Governance DOJ Download Due Diligence Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ESG FCPA Enforcement Actions Financial Crime Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) GDPR HIPAA Know Your Customer (KYC) Machine Learning Monitoring RegTech Reputation Risk Risk Assessment SEC Social Media Risk Supply Chain Technology Third Party Risk Management Tone at the Top Training Whistleblowing
No Result
View All Result

Privacy Policy

Founded in 2010, CCI is the web’s premier global independent news source for compliance, ethics, risk and information security. 

Got a news tip? Get in touch. Want a weekly round-up in your inbox? Sign up for free. No subscription fees, no paywalls. 

Follow Us

Browse Topics:

  • CCI Press
  • Compliance
  • Compliance Podcasts
  • Cybersecurity
  • Data Privacy
  • eBooks Published by CCI
  • Ethics
  • FCPA
  • Featured
  • Financial Services
  • Fraud
  • Governance
  • GRC Vendor News
  • HR Compliance
  • Internal Audit
  • Leadership and Career
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Opinion
  • Resource Library
  • Risk
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Well-Being
  • Whitepapers

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • About CCI
    • Writing for CCI
    • NEW: CCI Press – Book Publishing
    • Advertise With Us
  • Explore Topics
    • See All Articles
    • Compliance
    • Ethics
    • Risk
    • FCPA
    • Governance
    • Fraud
    • Internal Audit
    • HR Compliance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Privacy
    • Financial Services
    • Well-Being at Work
    • Leadership and Career
    • Opinion
  • Vendor News
  • Career Connection
  • Events
    • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Library
    • Whitepapers & Reports
    • eBooks
    • CCI Press & Compliance Bookshelf
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Corporate Compliance Insights

Welcome to CCI. This site uses cookies. Please click OK to accept. Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT