Home » Compliance » Featured Columns » General Interest » Risk » Currently Reading:

Introducing CCI Featured Columnist Jason Meyer: Anti-Bribery Enforcement is a Real Risk

by Jason Meyer @ 2009-07-13

Category: Compliance, Featured Columns, General Interest, Risk

[Editor's Note: Corporate Compliance Insights is rolling out a new feature this week: articles by featured columnists. The first CCI featured columnist is Jason Meyer, the author of LeadGood.org and the Chair of NJCCA’s Ethics, Governance, and Compliance Committee. Jason previously authored a featured article here at the site.

Jason's first column is below, and he is currently planning to contribute 2-4 articles per month (depending on his schedule) dealing with current event topics in compliance and governance. We are planning to roll out other featured columnists in the future, and you will be able to find their most recent columns in the CCI Spotlight at the top of every page, as well as in the sidebar.

To contact us about becoming a featured columnist, click here to use our contact form or send an email to jerod[at]corporatecomplianceinsights[dot].com]

——————–

Anti-Bribery Enforcement is a Real Risk

I have sometimes gotten a sense of annoyance from executives — even the ones who are fairly ethically oriented — when it comes to the specter of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: the country’s primary statute to combat international bribery. The law can hold a US company culpable for the actions of its people overseas, even something as (arguably) remote as an independent contractor sales agent being too lavish in entertaining a doctor who works at a foreign state-owned hospital. Somehow, the law’s sweep, and its ambitious aim of leveling the commercial playing field by prohibiting what for years had been viewed as an unavoidable way of doing business, seems to make some execs resent the serious work needed to avoid a violation. (It reminds me of sitcom cliches about getting kids to do math homework: “It’s so haaaaard. Do I hafta?”)

Yes, you hafta — and for potent proof see a new criminal plea that was in the news last week:

WASHINGTON, June 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — A former executive of Philadelphia-based Nexus Technologies Inc. pleaded guilty today in connection with his participation in a conspiracy to bribe Vietnamese government officials in exchange for lucrative contracts to supply equipment and technology to Vietnamese government agencies, in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA),…

This was not a big FCPA case against a big company. Siemens wound up shelling out some $800 Million in fines and disgorgements. But Lukas could wind up with ten years in the slammer.

So I think the Lukas case is a more potent warning. It says that FCPA enforcement won’t be limited to monster claims against ginormous companies. Any company can get nailed, and more to the point, executives who are not little Madoffs can still go to jail. Consider that, next time you hear an exec acting like her lawyer’s warnings about FCPA are the compliance equivalent of the Boy Who Cried Wolf.

And on the positive side, setting up the training, and systems, and monitoring, to mitigate the risk of FCPA violations can pay corollary benefits in terms of setting”tone from the top.” You can always quote JFK, and say your team should do it because it’s hard.

Print

Tags: , , , , , ,


WallStreetBlips: vote it up!



Corporate Compliance Insights was founded by Maurice Gilbert, the Managing Director
of Conselium, a premier global executive search firm for compliance.

Enter your email address to subscribe to the CCI Daily Digest:


Delivered by FeedBurner, Corporate Compliance Insights, and the Conselium compliance search group




Comment on this Article:







Categories

FCPA Compliance: Featured Column by Mike Koehler

Archives